- Teismas
- Europos Žmogaus Teisių Teismas
- Dokumentas
- HJUDLIT
- Data
- 2011-03-01
- Bylos Nr.
- 13109/04
- Bylos rūšis
- EŽTT sprendimas
- Instancija
- Tarptautinis teismas
- Rezultatas
- CASE OF LALAS v. LITHUANIA — Violation of Art. 6-1
- Pareiškėjas
- LALAS
- Atsakovas
- LITHUANIA
This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
1. The case originated in an application (no. 13109/04) against the Republic of Lithuania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Lithuanian national, Marius Lalas (“the applicant”), on 12 April 2004.
2. The applicant was represented by Mr O. Martinkus, a lawyer practising in Klaipeda. The Lithuanian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Elvyra Baltutytė.
3. The applicant alleged that, in breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, he had been subjected to entrapment, and had thus been unfairly convicted of drug dealing. He further complained that certain essential evidence had not been disclosed at his trial.
4. On 9 June 2009 the President of the Second Section decided to give notice of the applicant's complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1).